Against the backdrop of the widespread uncertainty regarding the United States attacks on Venezuela, the seizure of leader Nicolás Maduro, and Donald Trump's announcement that the US will “manage” the country and “take back the oil”, there is no doubt – this establishes a profoundly disturbing precedent.
The United States has a grim history of interference, invasion and occupation in that part of the world, but this past Saturday morning witnessed its initial significant armed assault on the soil of a South American nation. “American dominance in the western hemisphere will never be questioned again,” Mr Trump declared.
The move to assault another sovereign country and seize its president – just a short time after he publicly sought an off-ramp – possesses far-reaching consequences. We all have reason to be worried.
Venezuelans have suffered under an oppressive, corrupt, and inept government under Mr Maduro, commonly thought to have fraudulently won the most recent election. They now face extreme instability in the best case. Mr Trump has remarked that Maduro's second-in-command, Delcy RodrĂguez would follow US instructions, and rejected conservative dissident leader and Nobel prize-winner MarĂa Corina Machado as a viable alternative.
However, Ms RodrĂguez, now the acting leader, has so far struck a defiant tone – and other factions of the decapitated regime are considerably more radical.
A man who came to office pledging to stop foreign wars now says he is “willing to put soldiers into combat”. Renaming the Department of Defense as the Department of War was more than posturing. He does not see the world’s superpower as a guardian of order; he is transforming it into a renegade nation.
He is convinced that the United States' strength permits it to do as it wishes with little consequence: consider the military actions against Nigeria and Iranian installations. He promises that Venezuelan oil means this most recent venture “will be financially free”.
George W. Bush initiated war in Iraq on a lie. But this action without legal basis came absent any United Nations mandate or the consent of the US Congress; the opposition party was kept in the dark and say they were actively misled in briefings. Mr Trump is not trying to twist international norms, but to shatter them.
Set aside the implication this carries to leaders in Moscow, Beijing, and beyond, and consider the destination for America itself. While the raid is said to have slain 40 Venezuelans, including civilians, not a single US soldier was lost. Mr Trump’s escalating feeling of being untouchable will almost certainly fuel further adventurism.
No one buys the excuse that this is related to the drug trade. Venezuela is only a secondary pathway for cocaine; Mr Trump recently exonerated the past Honduran leader Juan Orlando Hernández for narcotics and arms offenses. Mr Trump himself has stated plainly that he is propelled by the allure of petroleum resources as well as machismo, the beliefs held by certain advisors, and the appetite for triumphalism as his standing with the American public falters.
The worldwide reception, especially in Europe, has – with honourable exceptions – been shockingly muted. That’s not due to Mr Maduro’s sins, but anxiety over Mr Trump’s wrath. The forceful statement from UN Secretary General António Guterres was commendable, but this episode highlights the institution’s growing irrelevance.
Mr Trump’s voters who oppose foreign entanglements could still pressure him to focus on domestic issues once more – but escalating insurance prices, public anxiety over the economy and other domestic scandals increase his appetite for distraction.
We are not yet 12 months into his presidential term. World leaders may regret it if they remain quiet at this juncture, given what – and who – could be next.
A seasoned gaming analyst with over a decade of experience in online casino trends and strategy development.